What Do Unions Do for Professionals? Evidence from Faculty Unionization in U.S. Higher Education
About 45 percent of U.S. union members work in management, professional, and related occupations, yet most evidence on what unions do comes from blue-collar jobs and occupations paid on fixed salary schedules. Faculty unionization in U.S. higher education offers a setting to study bargaining where pay is set individually and tied to productivity. We combine the staggered timing of faculty unionization between 1993 and 2023 with institution-level salaries and headcounts from IPEDS and restricted-use Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) microdata, which allow us to follow doctorate-holding faculty over time.
Unionization does not raise average salaries at any tenure-line rank: under parallel trends, we rule out gains of more than about $900 a year for assistant professors and $1,400 for full professors. Unionization does change employment. Total faculty employment is unchanged, but the median unionizing institution employs four to eight fewer assistant professors than comparable institutions, following an expansion in the years before unionization. Faculty who stay at unionizing institutions see faster salary growth, largest for non-tenure-track faculty and, among tenure-line faculty, concentrated below full professor. Exits and movement along the tenure track do not change. The findings broaden the margin of adjustment to collective bargaining from pay alone to the composition and careers of the academic workforce.